|
Post by speedy on Jun 28, 2012 5:01:52 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by David B. Benson on Jun 28, 2012 13:41:22 GMT 9.5
The article states that the BN series reactors use Mox. I fail to understand how this is a fast reactor.
|
|
|
Post by Nick P. on Jun 28, 2012 15:40:55 GMT 9.5
The article states that the BN series reactors use Mox. I fail to understand how this is a fast reactor. What do you mean? Fast reactors can use mixed oxide fuels. I don't see the point of it personally as my understanding of it is that it only makes reprocessing more difficult.
|
|
|
Post by David Walters on Jun 29, 2012 2:54:16 GMT 9.5
Fast Reactors can use almost any fuel. MOX is only a problem for reprocessing in LWRs, not FRs which by definition, have super high burn up rates, especially of antinides, the nasty stuff in LWR created MOX SNF.
D.
|
|
|
Post by anonposter on Jun 29, 2012 13:29:12 GMT 9.5
The article states that the BN series reactors use Mox. I fail to understand how this is a fast reactor. It doesn't have a moderator to slow the neutrons down. Whether or not it's a fast reactor depends on the neutron spectrum, not the fuel composition.
|
|
|
Post by grlcowan on Jun 30, 2012 3:10:51 GMT 9.5
... MOX is only a problem for reprocessing in LWRs, not FRs which by definition, have super high burn up rates, especially of antinides, the nasty stuff in LWR created MOX SNF. D. MOX, mixed oxide fuel, are a problem to reprocess no matter what sort of reactor they are from. Fast neutrons can indeed burn out the a ctinides -- not antinides -- more effectively than slow neutrons can, but they can't burn out the oxygen.
|
|
|
Post by David B. Benson on Jul 1, 2012 11:50:27 GMT 9.5
I understand a bit better now. My thanks to the responders.
Why is the oxygen any sort of problem?
|
|